1. What is most likely the speaker's reason for including the following series of questions (paragraph 8)? Would you have me argue that man is entilled to liberty? That he.is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declouberty? wrongfulness of slavery?Is that already declared it. Must I argue be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation as a matter beset with great difficulty. involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to be understood? How should I look to-day, in the presence of Americans, dividing, and subdiv a discourse, to show that men have a natural right to freedom? Speaking of it relatively and positively negatively and affirmatively. To do so would be to make myself ridiculous, and to offer an insult to your understanding. There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him. Answer choices for the above question A. To show that Republicans are not to be taken seriously B. To insist that arguing the wrongfulness of slavery ridicules the person arguing and insults the listener C. To suggest that logic and argumentation are the strongest weapons against slavery D. To show he has a great sense of humor 5. Which of these inferences is best supported by this speech? Answer choices for the above question A. The Fourth of July should become a national day of mourning. B. America has no moral high ground to criticize other nations for violenc against their people. . All the prayerful demonstrations in America cannot cover up the hypc lowing a crime against fiumanity.

Question

1. What is most likely the speaker's reason for including the following series of questions (paragraph 8)? Would you have me argue that man is entilled to liberty? That he.is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declouberty? wrongfulness of slavery?Is that already declared it. Must I argue be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation as a matter beset with great difficulty. involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to be understood? How should I look to-day, in the presence of Americans, dividing, and subdiv a discourse, to show that men have a natural right to freedom? Speaking of it relatively and positively negatively and affirmatively. To do so would be to make myself ridiculous, and to offer an insult to your understanding. There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him. Answer choices for the above question A. To show that Republicans are not to be taken seriously B. To insist that arguing the wrongfulness of slavery ridicules the person arguing and insults the listener C. To suggest that logic and argumentation are the strongest weapons against slavery D. To show he has a great sense of humor 5. Which of these inferences is best supported by this speech? Answer choices for the above question A. The Fourth of July should become a national day of mourning. B. America has no moral high ground to criticize other nations for violenc against their people. . All the prayerful demonstrations in America cannot cover up the hypc lowing a crime against fiumanity.

Answer 1

1. La respuesta correcta es **B. Insistir en que argumentar la injusticia de la esclavitud ridiculiza a la persona que argumenta e insulta al oyente.**El orador utiliza una serie de preguntas retóricas para enfatizar lo obvio que es la maldad de la esclavitud. No cree que sea necesario argumentar algo tan fundamental y considera que hacerlo sería insultante para su audiencia, que ya debería estar de acuerdo con él. Las otras opciones no reflejan el propósito de las preguntas.5. La inferencia mejor respaldada por el discurso es **C. Todas las demostraciones piadosas en Estados Unidos no pueden encubrir la hipocresía de la esclavitud, un crimen contra la humanidad.**El discurso se centra en la contradicción entre la celebración de la libertad el 4 de julio y la continua existencia de la esclavitud en Estados Unidos. El orador argumenta que la nación no puede proclamarse defensora de la libertad mientras oprime a una parte de su población. Esto apunta directamente a la hipocresía de la situación y la gravedad de la esclavitud como un crimen contra la humanidad. Las otras opciones, aunque podrían ser inferencias válidas en cierto contexto, no son el enfoque principal del argumento presentado en el fragmento.

Question

Solution

Answer