Question
The witness was asked to recall the events of the day. They were able to supply the information in surprising detail. The defense attorney doubted their apparently flawless memory because they understood which of the following? a. Details are never remembered well. b. "A flashbulb memory is usually a complete fake. c. Memories of dramatic events do not last more than three months. d. So-called flashbull memories may not be accurate but may seem so to the person experiencing them.
Solution
4.6
(250 Votes)
Leo
Professional ยท Tutor for 6 years
Answer
The correct answer is **d. So-called flashbulb memories may not be accurate but may seem so to the person experiencing them.**Here's why:* **a. Details are never remembered well:** This is a false generalization. People can and do remember details, sometimes with surprising accuracy. The issue isn't that details are *never* remembered, but that memory can be unreliable and prone to errors or distortions.* **b. "A flashbulb memory is usually a complete fake:** This is also incorrect. While flashbulb memories can be inaccurate, they aren't usually entirely fabricated. They represent a person's genuine recollection, even if that recollection is flawed.* **c. Memories of dramatic events do not last more than three months:** This is demonstrably false. People can retain memories of significant events for years, even decades.* **d. So-called flashbulb memories may not be accurate but may seem so to the person experiencing them:** This is the most accurate statement. Flashbulb memories are vivid and detailed memories of emotionally significant events. People experiencing them often have strong confidence in their accuracy. However, research has shown that these memories, despite their vividness and the confidence people hold in them, are susceptible to errors and can change over time, just like other types of memories. The person remembering feels very certain about their recall, but that certainty doesn't guarantee accuracy.