1. Write True if the statement is correct and False if it is incorrect 1 pt each) 1. All branches of Axiology deals with moral values and principles. 2. Mastering the content and arguments of other philosophers is a best way to be a philosopher. 3. Arguments that lack a premise and conclusion indicator are not considered argumentative passage. 4. Rationalism is an epistemological theory that contends that sense-obser vation is the source of knowledge. 5. Philosophy is not only imaginative process of formulating fundamental question but also process of resolving them by rigorous analysis. 6. An argument formed based on the knowledge from the past and present evidence is inductive generalization. II. Match the description in Column A with the correspondence in Column B. (1pt each) A 7. All true premise with strong argument 8. True premises connect with false conclusion 9. All true premises with invalid arguments 10. The conclusion certainly inferred from the premises 11. All true premise support certainly true conclusion B A. Weak/invalid B. Cogent C. Sound D. Unsound E. Valid F. Strong/Valid G. Uncogent

Question

1. Write True if the statement is correct and False if it is incorrect 1 pt each) 1. All branches of Axiology deals with moral values and principles. 2. Mastering the content and arguments of other philosophers is a best way to be a philosopher. 3. Arguments that lack a premise and conclusion indicator are not considered argumentative passage. 4. Rationalism is an epistemological theory that contends that sense-obser vation is the source of knowledge. 5. Philosophy is not only imaginative process of formulating fundamental question but also process of resolving them by rigorous analysis. 6. An argument formed based on the knowledge from the past and present evidence is inductive generalization. II. Match the description in Column A with the correspondence in Column B. (1pt each) A 7. All true premise with strong argument 8. True premises connect with false conclusion 9. All true premises with invalid arguments 10. The conclusion certainly inferred from the premises 11. All true premise support certainly true conclusion B A. Weak/invalid B. Cogent C. Sound D. Unsound E. Valid F. Strong/Valid G. Uncogent

Answer 1

**I. True/False**1. **False**. Axiology is the study of value, which includes ethics (moral values) and aesthetics (values in art and beauty). Not all branches of axiology deal *exclusively* with moral values.2. **False**. While understanding other philosophers is crucial, simply mastering their content isn't enough. Being a philosopher requires independent critical thinking, developing original ideas, and engaging in philosophical discourse.3. **False**. While premise and conclusion indicators are helpful, an argument can still exist without them. The key is whether a set of statements offers reasons (premises) to support a claim (conclusion).4. **False**. Rationalism emphasizes reason and logic as the primary sources of knowledge, *not* sense observation. Empiricism is the theory that emphasizes sense experience.5. **True**. Philosophy involves both formulating fundamental questions and rigorously analyzing potential answers through logic and reasoning.6. **True**. Inductive generalization involves drawing a general conclusion from specific observations or evidence.**II. Matching**7. **C. Sound**. A sound argument has all true premises and is valid (the conclusion follows logically from the premises).8. **D. Unsound**. An unsound argument can have true premises but a false conclusion, or it can have a valid structure with at least one false premise.9. **A. Weak/invalid**. Even if the premises are true, if the argument is invalid, the conclusion doesn't logically follow, making it weak.10. **E. Valid**. Validity refers to the structure of the argument. If the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises, the argument is valid.11. **F. Strong/Valid**. This describes a deductively valid argument with true premises, ensuring a true conclusion. While "strong" is typically used for inductive arguments, in this context, it aligns with a sound deductive argument.

Question

Solution

Answer