Question
Question 9 (1 point) According to Saciya Ansaris reading of Joseph Carens in "What Do Borders Realy Do?", what's the cifference between a "criminal offence"and a civil vinlation and why does it matter to immigration? A) Charging undocumented migrants with a criminal offence gives rise to a criminal record, whereas charging them with a "civil violation"does not.The distinction matters because the criminalization of undocumented migrants offectively bars their path to citizenshio B) Undocumented migrants shouls be charged with a "criminal offerce" It they cross the border illcgally,bu: asylum seekers shoule ony be charged with a civil viclation' as they have not broken any laws. C) A "criminal offence implies a more dargeroy is threat to the public than a "Givily/plation: Treating-undasumertec migration 25 3 "crimina affence fucls the myth that migrants are criminals. D) All of the above
Solution
Expert Verified
4.4(352 Voting)
LeoMaster · Tutor for 5 years
Answer
**A) Charging undocumented migrants with a criminal offence gives rise to a criminal record, whereas charging them with a "civil violation" does not. The distinction matters because the criminalization of undocumented migrants effectively bars their path to citizenship.**<br /><br />Ansari argues that the distinction between criminal and civil violations in immigration matters has significant consequences. A criminal offense leads to a criminal record, which can create substantial barriers to obtaining legal status or citizenship later. Civil violations, while still carrying penalties, do not typically create the same lasting obstacles. Therefore, framing undocumented migration as a criminal act makes it much harder for individuals to regularize their status, even if they meet other requirements for citizenship down the line.<br />
Click to rate: