hearing? muggo skills in Candon. Backaround Information Gingh came to Canada from India seeking refluges status. Canada's government rejected his case under the Immigration Act, which did not allow Mr.Singh to state his case in person or appeal the government's decision. However the Eupreme Court of Canada ruled this violated the stated that the Charler applies to every person physically present in Canada Read these opinions on the issue. Speaker I: The only people who should be considered as immigrants or refugees are thore who apply through the proper procedures and not vetted abroad. There should not be an sutomatic right for refugees or immigrants to come to Carada. How can you apply to come to Canada from your own country if you're being persecuted there? We need to give people in that situation a full hearing Speaker III: It's unfair that Canadian taxpayers have to pay for legal aid, medical care,food, housing and security measures for people who arrive in the country illegally and then claim to be refugees. These rules only encourage abuse. Speaker IV: We need to protect people who are at risk from human rights violations. Yes, there may be some who are not genuine refugees, but why take the risk? - Adapted from Issues for Canadans page 181 __ 1. Which speakers agree with the - Speakers I and II - Speakers II and IV Speakers land III Speakers I and IV 2. Which person disagrees that the Charter applies to every person physically in Canada? Speaker I Speaker II Speaker III - Speaker IV 3. According to Speaker II refugees deserve a face-to-face hearing because - it is not practical for some refugees to apply for immigration from their home countries. many refugees are not literate. it is impossible for some refugees to travel to Canada. strain on the Canada's immigration system.