32 __ into the following results: Election is broken down Apple Party: 105 Pear Party: 175 Banana Party: 58 The government elected would be considered a: a. Good Government b. Majority Government c. Coalition Government d. Minority Government Part D: Short Answer - Communication Complete this portion of the test on the foolscap paper provided in proper paragraph structure. In a proper paragraph with a topic and a concluding sentence answer the following questions: When Justin Trudeau announced his resignation as Prime Minister he mentioned that he was able to lead the longest running Minority Government in all of Canada's History. Explain what a Minority Government meant for Canadians by discussing the pro and cons of Minority Government. Then, explain what the pros and cons are of Majority Government?Finally, answer the question, In your opinion what form of government is best minority or majority? Explain why you think so. /8 Marks

**Part A: Calculation**<br /><br />32 x 3 = 96<br /><br />**Part B: Multiple Choice**<br /><br />The correct answer is **b**. A perpendicular bisector forms a 90-degree angle (right angle) with the line segment it bisects (divides into two equal parts).<br /><br />**Part C: Multiple Choice**<br /><br />First, calculate the total number of votes cast: 105 + 175 + 58 = 338<br /><br />Since the Pear Party has 175 votes, and 175 is greater than half of the total votes (338/2 = 169), the Pear Party has a majority. Therefore, the answer is **b. Majority Government**.<br /><br />**Part D: Short Answer**<br /><br />A minority government, like the one Justin Trudeau led, occurs when no single party wins a majority of seats in the House of Commons. This means the governing party must rely on the support of other parties to pass legislation. For Canadians, this can have both advantages and disadvantages. One benefit is that minority governments tend to be more collaborative and responsive to the needs of diverse groups. The governing party must negotiate and compromise with other parties, leading to policies that reflect a broader range of perspectives. However, minority governments can also be less stable and more prone to falling, potentially triggering frequent elections and hindering long-term planning.<br /><br />Majority governments, on the other hand, enjoy greater stability and can implement their agenda more easily. With a majority of seats, the governing party can pass legislation without needing the support of other parties. This allows for quicker action on key issues and greater predictability. However, majority governments can sometimes be less responsive to the concerns of minority groups and may be tempted to act unilaterally without sufficient consultation.<br /><br />In my opinion, while both systems have merits, a minority government is often the better option. The collaborative nature of minority governments forces parties to work together, fostering compromise and ensuring a wider range of voices are heard. This leads to more representative policies and prevents any single party from wielding excessive power. While the potential for instability exists, the benefits of increased collaboration and representation outweigh this risk. A minority government, though potentially more challenging to manage, ultimately promotes a more democratic and inclusive political landscape.<br />