From the perspective of an internationalist United Nations military actions in response to ethnic and civil unrest is: acceptable, because global stability promotes economic growth acceptable, because the protection of human rights is a moral obligation unacceptable because the financial coast is too prohibitive for United Nations member states unacceptable, because armed conflict becomes too dangerous for United Nations personnel

From an internationalist perspective, United Nations military actions in response to ethnic and civil unrest are generally seen as **acceptable, because the protection of human rights is a moral obligation.** Internationalists believe in the interconnectedness of nations and the importance of international cooperation. The UN Charter itself emphasizes the importance of maintaining international peace and security and promoting respect for human rights. While the financial costs and risks to personnel are legitimate concerns, they are often viewed as secondary to the moral imperative to protect vulnerable populations from atrocities.<br />