ne United States Constitution provides for a system of checks and balances between branches of go anch has appeared more powerful than the others.This situation has occurred mainly because 1. amendments to the Constitution have altered the balance between the branches 2. certain events have required one branch temporarily to take more forceful approaches and ac 3. the states have assumed more power relative to the power of the Federal Government 4. the Constitution provides for a systemative rotation of power between the branches

The correct answer is **2. certain events have required one branch temporarily to take more forceful approaches and actions.**<br /><br />Here's why:<br /><br />* **Amendments:** While amendments *can* shift the balance of power, they are not the *primary* reason for temporary shifts. Amendments are a formal and relatively slow process. They represent lasting changes, not temporary power grabs.<br /><br />* **States' Power:** An increase in states' power would weaken the federal government as a whole, not necessarily shift power *between* the branches of the federal government.<br /><br />* **Rotation of Power:** The Constitution does not have a system of rotating power between branches. Each branch has its defined roles and responsibilities.<br /><br />* **Forceful Approaches/Actions:** Throughout US history, certain events (wars, economic crises, national emergencies) have led to one branch, often the executive, taking on more power temporarily to address the situation. This doesn't permanently alter the balance of power outlined in the Constitution, but it reflects the flexibility inherent in the system to respond to crises. Think of examples like Lincoln during the Civil War or FDR during the Great Depression.<br />