One argument to explain the male dominance of religion is: the importance of nature to survival the association of male imagery to fertility the rise of city -states Wait,what?Men don't dominate religion

The answer is **the association of male imagery to fertility**.<br /><br />Early religions often focused on fertility and the cycles of nature, crucial for survival in agricultural societies. The male role in procreation was sometimes symbolically linked to the life-giving forces of nature (sun, rain, etc.), leading to male deities representing these powers. This association, over time, could contribute to male dominance in religious hierarchies and practices.<br /><br />The other options are less directly related to explaining male dominance in religion:<br /><br />* **The importance of nature to survival:** While nature's importance is undeniable in shaping early religious beliefs, it doesn't inherently explain male dominance.<br />* **The rise of city-states:** City-states brought about complex social structures, which could exacerbate existing power imbalances, but they don't directly explain the origin of male dominance in religion.<br />* **Wait, what? Men don't dominate religion:** While it's true that women have played significant roles in many religions, historically and in the present, it's also true that many major religions have been and continue to be dominated by men in positions of power and leadership. This doesn't negate the important roles women have played, but it acknowledges a historical trend.<br />