Which of these examples is the best argument against the claim "The 1920s was a period of economic prosperity and social advancement"? The Tulsa Massacre The Halem Renaissance The Great Migration The 19th Amendment

The best argument against the claim that the 1920s was a period of economic prosperity and social advancement is **The Tulsa Massacre**.<br /><br />While the Harlem Renaissance, the Great Migration, and the 19th Amendment represent positive social and cultural developments, the Tulsa Massacre highlights the severe racial inequality and violence that persisted during the decade. The destruction of a prosperous Black community and the loss of life demonstrate that the "prosperity" of the 1920s was not shared equally and that significant social barriers remained. The other options, while important, don't directly contradict the idea of economic growth and some forms of social progress. The Tulsa Massacre, however, exposes the dark underbelly of the era and challenges any simplistic notion of universal prosperity and advancement.<br />