Home
/
History
/
Now road the passago and determine which constitutional principle was most directly in question On February 5, 1937 President Franklin Roosovel proposed the Judicial Reorganization Bill Under this law, the President would have had the power to appoint up to six new justicos. He justified this proposal both in the advanced age of several of the existing justices and in the need for the Court to work quickly to evaluate the many challenges that the New Deal had sparked Critics, however, said that Roosevelt wanted to "pack the court"so that he could appoint a majonty of justices who would be favorable to New Deal programs. In the end the proposal failed The constitutional prople most dirocily in question was Limited Government Federalism Separation of Powers Popular Soveresgnty

Question

Now road the passago and determine which constitutional principle was most directly in question On February 5, 1937 President Franklin Roosovel proposed the Judicial Reorganization Bill Under this law, the President would have had the power to appoint up to six new justicos. He justified this proposal both in the advanced age of several of the existing justices and in the need for the Court to work quickly to evaluate the many challenges that the New Deal had sparked Critics, however, said that Roosevelt wanted to "pack the court"so that he could appoint a majonty of justices who would be favorable to New Deal programs. In the end the proposal failed The constitutional prople most dirocily in question was Limited Government Federalism Separation of Powers Popular Soveresgnty

Now road the passago and determine which constitutional principle was most directly in question On February 5, 1937 President Franklin Roosovel proposed the Judicial Reorganization Bill Under this law, the President would have had the power to appoint up to six new justicos. He justified this proposal both in the advanced age of several of the existing justices and in the need for the Court to work quickly to evaluate the many challenges that the New Deal had sparked Critics, however, said that Roosevelt wanted to "pack the court"so that he could appoint a majonty of justices who would be favorable to New Deal programs. In the end the proposal failed The constitutional prople most dirocily in question was Limited Government Federalism Separation of Powers Popular Soveresgnty

Solution

expert verifiedExpert Verified
4.6(324 Voting)
avatar
EvieProfessional · Tutor for 6 years

Answer

The constitutional principle most directly in question was **Separation of Powers**.<br /><br />Roosevelt's proposal to add justices to the Supreme Court threatened the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches. The executive branch (President Roosevelt) was attempting to exert influence over the judicial branch (Supreme Court) in a way that many felt was inappropriate and potentially tyrannical. The concern was that packing the court would allow the president to circumvent the checks and balances intended by the Constitution and effectively control the judicial branch's decisions.<br />
Click to rate: