4. How do you define Imperialism? Is this definition the same as the one you have for "historic globalisation"? If so, why? If not why?

Imperialism is a policy or ideology of extending a nation's rule over foreign territories and peoples, often by establishing colonies, protectorates, or spheres of influence. It involves political, economic, and cultural dominance, frequently achieved through military force, but also through diplomatic pressure, economic leverage, and cultural influence. The core element is the exertion of power and control by one nation over another.<br /><br />Historic globalization, on the other hand, refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of different parts of the world throughout history. While it involves the exchange of goods, ideas, and cultures, it doesn't inherently imply the kind of political dominance and control that is central to imperialism. Historic globalization can occur through peaceful trade, migration, and cultural diffusion.<br /><br />Therefore, imperialism and historic globalization are **not** the same. While imperialism can be *a driver* of historic globalization, it's not the only one, and the two concepts are distinct. Imperialism is a specific type of international relationship characterized by domination and control, while historic globalization is a broader process of increasing interconnectedness that can arise from various factors, including, but not limited to, imperialism. Think of it this way: imperialism can be a tool or a method used to achieve expansion within a larger context of globalization, but globalization itself can exist without imperialistic actions.<br />