Which of the two systems, cash and carry or lend-lease, do you believe was better for the United States'Provide at least 2 reasons

Both the **cash and carry** and **lend-lease** systems were crucial in supporting the Allied war effort during World War II. However, they differed in their approach and had different impacts on the United States. <br /><br />Here's a breakdown of why **lend-lease** was arguably a better system for the United States:<br /><br />1. **Greater Impact on the War Effort:** Lend-lease allowed the US to provide massive amounts of military aid to its allies without directly engaging in combat. This significantly strengthened the Allied war effort, ultimately leading to a faster victory and reducing the potential for American casualties. <br />2. **Economic Benefits:** While cash and carry generated revenue for the US, lend-lease ultimately proved more beneficial economically. By supplying goods and services, the US stimulated its own industries and created jobs, boosting the American economy during the war. Additionally, lend-lease helped to establish the US as a global economic power, paving the way for postwar prosperity.<br /><br />While cash and carry was a valuable tool in the early stages of the war, lend-lease ultimately proved to be a more effective and beneficial system for the United States. It allowed the US to play a decisive role in the Allied victory while simultaneously bolstering its own economy and international standing. <br />