- Can civil liberties or rights be changed over time? no yes
- What is 0 Bon what do they do during that day? How do they celebrate?
- meet Suppose then that we invite him to accompany us in the argument, and then we may hope to show him that there is nothing peculiar in the constitution of women which would affect them in the administration of the State. By all means. Let us say to him: Come now, and we will ask you a question;-when you spoke of a nature gifted or not gifted in any respect,did you mean to say that one man will acquire a thing easily, another with difficulty; a little learning will lead the one to discover a great deal; whereas the other,after much study and application, no sooner learns than he forgets; or again, did you mean that the one has a body which is a good servant to his mind, while the body of the other is a hindrance to him?-would not these be the sort of differences which distinguish the man gifted by speaker's claim that women are as qualified âs men to manage the state? abductive reasoning, because the speaker explain: how women make decisions deductive reasoning, because the speaker provides examples of how women are qualified kairos, because the speaker calls for immediate equality for women in government ethos, because the speaker describes the women he thinks deserve to be leaders
- What is a hypothesis? __ This is a required question
- Read the excerpt from The Republic by Plato. Do you observe that we were not far wrong in our guess that temperance was a sort of harmony? Why so? Why, because temperance is unlike courage and wisdom, each of which resides in a part only, the one making the State wise and the other valiant;not so temperance, which extends to the whole, and runs through all the notes of the scale, and produces a harmony of the weaker and the stronger and the middle class, whether you suppose them to be stronger or weaker in wisdom or power or numbers or wealth, or anything else.Most truly then may we deem temperance to be the agreement of the naturally superior and inferior, as to the right to rule of either, both in states and individuals. How does the phrase "naturally superior and inferior" support the speaker's claim? It uses antithesis to establish a middle ground between opposing forces. It uses metonymy to represent larger factors and values that are at play. It uses pathos in the form of strong language to persuade the audience. It uses ethos by drawing on life experiences that the speaker has had.
